Skip Navigation


Proceedings of the London Mathematical Society Advance Access originally published online on July 31, 2008
Proceedings of the London Mathematical Society 2009 98(2):365-392; doi:10.1112/plms/pdn030
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
98/2/365    most recent
pdn030v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Green, B.
Right arrow Articles by Tao, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 2008 London Mathematical Society

New bounds for Szemerédi's theorem, I: progressions of length 4 in finite field geometries

Ben Green

Centre for Mathematical Sciences
Wilberforce Road
Cambridge
CB3 0WA
United Kingdom

Terence Tao

Department of Mathematics
UCLA
Los Angeles, CA 90095-1555
USA
tao@math.ucla.edu

Received 26 September 2005. Revision received 4 February 2008.

Let k ≥ 3 be an integer, and let G be a finite abelian group with |G| = N, where (N, (k – 1)!) = 1. We write rk(G) for the largest cardinality |A| of a set A {subseteq} G which does not contain k distinct elements in arithmetic progression. The famous theorem of Szemerédi essentially asserts that rk(Z/NZ) = ok(N). It is known, in fact, that the estimate rk(G) = ok(N) holds for all G. There have been many papers concerning the issue of finding quantitative bounds for rk(G). A result of Bourgain states thatr3(G) << N(log log N/log N)1/2 for all G. In this paper we obtain a similar bound for r4(G) in the particular case G = Fn, where F is a fixed finite field with char (F) != 2, 3 (for example, F = F5). We prove that r4(G) << F N(log N)c for some absolute constant c > 0. In future papers we will treat the general abelian groups G, eventually obtaining a comparable result for an arbitrary G.


2000 Mathematics Subject Classification 11B99.

The first author is a Clay Research Fellow, and is pleased to acknowledge the support of the Clay Mathematics Institute. Some of this work was carried out while he was on a long-term visit to MIT. The second author is supported by a grant from the Packard Foundation.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.