Skip Navigation


Proceedings of the London Mathematical Society Advance Access originally published online on January 7, 2009
Proceedings of the London Mathematical Society 2009 99(1):67-99; doi:10.1112/plms/pdn053
This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
99/1/67    most recent
pdn053v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wall, C. T. C.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 2009 London Mathematical Society

Transversality in families of mappings

C. T. C. Wall

Department of Mathematical Sciences
University of Liverpool
Liverpool
L69 7ZL
United Kingdom

Received 1 October 2007. Revision received 25 September 2008.

If N and P are smooth manifolds, and Q is a smooth submanifold of P, the set of maps of N to P transverse to Q is residual. However given a family F of smooth mappings, we cannot expect to be able to deform the family to make each member of the family transverse to Q. The development of generic transversality conditions runs in parallel with that of stability theory. We develop a convenient notation, and establish equivalence of different transversality conditions. The first main result expresses equivalence between F inducing a versal unfolding of any multi-germ, multi-transversality of F to contact orbits relative to projection on the parameter space U, and local stability of the projection to U of the pre-image of Q. For global stability we need Q to be closed, the deformation F to be proper, and Q or N compact.

Corresponding results also hold for topological stability in the Thom–Mather sense, and an appropriate notion of topological versality.

To obtain results with Q a stratified subset of P requires an extensive study of theories of contact equivalence relative to a subset of the target. Here we need an analyticity hypothesis on Q; for deeper study of finite determinacy, we need a holonomic condition; even so, the theory is much more complicated. In general, there are properties corresponding to the former ones, but many are weaker. Our second main result, a direct analogue of the first, is only obtained under a hypotheses that F has property (G) at all points and is transverse to Q.

In the topological case, while some results can be obtained, the failure of direct analogues to some basic tools is a bar to further progress.

2000 Mathematics Subject Classification 57R45 (primary), 32S60, 32S15 (secondary).


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.